Epsilon, LLC
Win More Government Contracts
Your technical solution is solid. Your pricing is competitive. But your proposals keep losing. We fix that. PRISM VECTOR handles the full proposal lifecycle — compliance matrix through final delivery — so you stop leaving contract value on the table.
Why Good Contractors Lose
Most losing proposals share the same structural failures. The evaluator never sees your best work because it never makes it past the first compliance gate.
Compliance Nonconformance
A missing FAR 52.212-1 certification or unsigned SF-33 gets your proposal returned unread. We build a compliance matrix against every clause, instruction, and evaluation factor in the solicitation. Nothing slips through.
Rushed Delivery
You find the RFP with 10 days left. Your BD team wrote nothing. Your PMs are billable. When you submit at 4:59pm on the due date, the formatting errors pile up. We run a 48-hour express track for exactly this scenario.
Weak Win Themes
"We're the best" isn't a discriminator. Most proposals never state why the government should pick you over the incumbent. We build win themes anchored to source selection criteria and substantiated by your past performance data.
What We Actually Do
Not "strategy consulting." Hands-on proposal production. You provide the technical content and pricing data. We turn it into a compliant, evaluator-ready submission.
Full Proposal Production
Compliance matrix, annotated outline, color team reviews, writing, editing, formatting, and packaging. You stay focused on operations. We deliver the proposal.
Compliance & QA Review
Multi-pass review against every section L, M, and C requirement. Red team led by former government evaluators who know exactly what a source selection board looks for.
Capture & Positioning
Pre-RFP intelligence, competitive analysis, teaming strategy, and pricing narrative. If you call us before the RFP drops, we help shape the opportunity. If you call us after, we help you catch up.
Past Performance Volumes
Most contractors submit the same three CPARS excerpts on every bid. We build tailored past performance volumes that map directly to the PWS and evaluation criteria.
How an Engagement Runs
Every proposal follows the same sequence. We built this process from hundreds of submissions across DoD, civilian, and IC agencies.
Discovery & Compliance Mapping
We dissect the solicitation and build a full compliance matrix within 24 hours of engagement. Every clause, instruction, and evaluation factor is mapped. You get a go/no-go assessment, an annotated outline, and a schedule. If the RFP is unwinnable for structural reasons, we tell you before you spend a dime on writing.
Draft, Review, Iterate
We write the first draft. You review for technical accuracy. We run a red team against the evaluation criteria. The output is a scored, gap-identified draft — not a rough cut. Every review cycle tightens compliance and sharpens win themes. Most engagements take two draft cycles before final polish.
Final Polish & Submission
Compliance sweep. Formatting lock. Delivery in the required format — electronic, hard copy, or portal upload. We stay on standby through the evaluation period to draft responses to clarification requests and ENs. You hear from us within two hours of any agency communication.
Results
Case Study: Pat Williams Construction
A real loss from March 2026. A small business, a $3.7M Army Corps contract, four missing pieces of paper — and a protest the GAO just denied. Here is exactly what happened and how PRISM VECTOR would have changed the outcome.
Pat Williams Construction, a small business in Leeville, Louisiana, responded to an Army Corps of Engineers RFP for a facility renovation at Fort Johnson. The solicitation required bidders to submit a summary schedule with specific schedule data. PWC submitted a proposal — but their summary schedule was incomplete.
The Army's evaluation board found four deficiencies in PWC's schedule submission. The schedule did not include total float values. It omitted required ordering dates and anticipated delivery durations for long-lead items. The agency also identified one weakness and two uncertainties.
The Corps rated PWC's proposal unacceptable and ineligible for award. PWC argued the deficiencies were "administrative and documentation-based." The GAO agreed they were administrative — and then denied the protest anyway, ruling that missing material solicitation requirements makes a proposal unfixable after submission. The contract went to a competitor from Kansas. PWC got nothing.
Source: GAO Decision B-424168, March 25, 2026
Every proposal we touch starts with a compliance matrix — every Section L instruction, every Section M evaluation factor, every amendment. Before a word of narrative is written, we map what the government requires and build a checklist that gates every submission.
In PWC's case, the compliance matrix would have surfaced the schedule requirements on day one. The QA review — a multi-pass process we run before any proposal leaves the building — would have flagged all four missing data fields before the submission deadline. None of the deficiencies were substantive. PWC had the schedule data. They simply did not include it in the formatted submission.
The fix is not complicated. It takes a compliance matrix, a structured QA pass, and the discipline to run it before you hit send. That is what we do. PWC's proposal — had it passed through PRISM VECTOR — would have been technically acceptable and competitively evaluated. Instead of a denied protest and $3.7M left on the table, they would have been in the award discussion. Possibly the winner.
Analyze Your Last Loss
Answer a few questions about the contract you lost and we will show you exactly what went wrong — before you talk to us or spend a dollar.
Step 1 of 3
What type of contract did you lose?
What went wrong? Check everything that applies.
Loss severity score
This is an automated analysis. For a full forensic review — including a red-team assessment of your last submission against the actual evaluation criteria — we will do it in person.
Get a Full AssessmentCredentials
Ready to Stop Losing?
Fill out the form and we will review your last loss, your next opportunity, or both. No pitch deck. No "solutions architect." Just a conversation about what went wrong and how to fix it.